A semiconductor engineer with over a decade of experience in solid state device research and industry analysis.
Long-standing racism is returning to UK politics, which leaves citizens very scared, the Prime Minister has stated, cautioning that divisive far-right politics are “tearing our country apart”.
In conversation to GP and TV personality Amir Khan, Starmer accused the Reform UK party of overseeing a return to discriminatory and divisive political discourse “that frankly I thought we had dealt with decades ago”.
During the discussion, which aired on ITV’s Lorraine show on Tuesday, Starmer provided his strongest signal suggesting the two-child benefit cap might be scrapped in the budget in the coming weeks.
Asked whether he planned to eliminate the limit, which charities have said is the biggest driver of poverty for children in the UK, the Prime Minister responded: “Let me be perfectly clear I am committed to drive child poverty down.”
He outlined measures ministers have already introduced such as free school meals, morning meal programs, and childcare but added: “We must go beyond these efforts, and I assure you that I will personally focus to cutting childhood poverty.”
Pressed on whether his remarks meant he would lift the two-child limit, he stated he “wouldn’t be telling you we plan to reduce child poverty unless I was certain that measures will be introduced several steps for that purpose”.
Rachel Reeves, gave an equally strong hint earlier this week when she told a national radio station that ultimately, a child should not be penalised if their parents are struggling financially”.
Government officials are understood to be preparing to lift the limit entirely, having originally looked at ways to taper it for bigger households or wealthier families. An economic thinktank has estimated this would cost roughly £3.5 billion in the coming years.
In the interview, the Prime Minister explained the ideological split currently in Britain existed between Labour’s “patriotic national renewal” and Reform’s harmful divisiveness and other right-wing groups who were “splitting the UK”.
“Some of the rhetoric we’re hearing – discriminatory talk, divisive rhetoric – that frankly I thought had been addressed in the past has reemerged in political debate and citizens are fearful,” he stated.
“We must confront to that racism, that divisiveness, and we have to proudly say that British identity involves caring for others, is to be reasonable, is to be tolerant and kindness, and we’re proud of that.”
Starmer echoed language expressed by the Health Secretary, who warned earlier this month how an “ugly” racism reminiscent of the 1970s and 1980s had become worryingly commonplace again and that healthcare workers were facing the worst of it.
The health secretary said occurrences of verbal and physical abuse based on people’s skin colour had become so frequent that it was now “tolerated to hold racist views”.
“We must end to discrimination across the UK and we’ve got to put that ugly racist sentiment that has emerged in our country where it belongs and once again create an environment across Britain where racism is unacceptable to hold racist views,” Streeting stated.
Starmer used his speech during a major political gathering this autumn to draw clear divisions between himself and Farage, saying that the public faced a pivotal moment.
The prime minister explained he was engaged in a “fight for the soul of our country”, noting although voters expressed valid worries about illegal migration, existed an ethical boundary which some politicians had crossed.
The PM pledged to confront anyone who argued that non-white individuals could not be English or British and that households residing in the UK for generations should be deported, saying people promoting such views constituted “against national unity”.
“Encouraging racial attacks and hatred, that is not expressing concern: it’s criminal. This party – this great party – is proud of our flags, yet if they are painted with hateful messages, targeting a business owner to ‘go home’, that is not patriotism; that is pure discrimination,” he informed activists.
A semiconductor engineer with over a decade of experience in solid state device research and industry analysis.